Hello Literacy
Friends!
As I continued to
update my knowledge for my upcoming Literacy Difficulties course, I came across
a very recent article that examines the relative impact of word reading and vocabulary
knowledge on the reading comprehension of adequate and struggling adolescent readers.
I found that the article does an excellent job laying out these relationships and
thus gives real insight into the causes of differences in reading comprehension
among adolescents. I will try to unpack the findings in an efficient manner for
you all here.
First, the study
included 796 middle schoolers (average age of 14.1), with 491 in the adequate
comprehension group and 305 in the struggling comprehension group (below 30% on
the Gates comprehension test). These students were assessed for vocabulary
knowledge, word reading, reading efficiency (fluency), and inferencing. The researchers
analyzed the direct and indirect effect of word reading and vocab knowledge on
reading comprehension. (Indirect effects included the effect of each these two components on reading efficiency and inferencing multiplied by the respective effect of reading
efficiency and inferencing on reading comprehension.) In the end, the authors could
then consider the total effects of word reading and vocab on reading comp for a)
the total sample, b) the adequate comprehenders, and c) the struggling comprehenders.
So, here, in a nutshell, are the outcomes:
1)
Word
reading was a significant predictor of comprehension for the entire sample
(effect .21); however, word reading had a large effect on comprehension for struggling
comprehenders and a negligible effect for adequate comprehenders. This supports
the notion that, in the authors’ words, “there
is a threshold of word reading skill that has to be met before its relation to
reading comprehension subsides. It is possible that the struggling
comprehenders did not have the requisite word reading skills necessary to
easily extract meaning from text.”
2)
Vocabulary
was a greater significant predictor of comprehension for the entire sample than
word reading (effect .60). Vocabulary had a larger effect on
comprehension for adequate comprehenders (.62) than struggling comprehenders (.18).
The authors summed up these results in this way, “While vocabulary favored the
adequate group as a predictor, it was also a statistically significant
predictor for the struggling comprehenders. Thus, vocabulary plays an important
role for struggling and adequate readers alike.”
3)
Vocabulary
knowledge significantly positively impacted the adequate readers’ reading efficiency
and inferencing. In simple terms, students with higher vocabulary scores were slightly more
fluent readers and better at making inferences.
4)
Without
getting into the more complex details, the outcomes related to the struggling comprehenders led the authors to conclude…
“instruction in word reading and vocabulary may lead to
greater gains for struggling readers than instruction aimed at increasing
fluency. Indeed, this view is supported in the synthesis of effective interventions
for struggling adolescent readers by Edmonds et al., who found that word
reading instruction led to greater and more consistent gains than fluency instruction.”
I would summarize things this way.
It is clear that word reading difficulties have a strong impact on students’
comprehension. Basically, until students can read the words well, other components matter
less: the students are simply hung up on reading the words. On the other hand, once students reach a high
level of word reading proficiency, knowing the meanings of the individual words
greatly impacts their reading comprehension, both directly and because it makes
them better at inferencing and slightly more fluent.
My takeaway is that elementary
schools should prioritize both of these key components! I believe that it quite
feasible for elementary schools to equip nearly all students with strong word reading
skills, and, if we can, we should. But, just as significantly, vocabulary knowledge
was a significant predictor of comprehension for all students and particularly for
the adequate comprehenders. Teachers often ask me, “We rightfully think a lot about
our lower-performing students. But, how can we push those kids right in the middle
to a higher level? Well, this study shows that if we want students to be especially
strong comprehenders in middle school, we need to be teaching vocabulary comprehensively
and consistently across the elementary grades. So, at this point, I’ll put in a
plug for my earlier CLC post on VALE vocabulary instruction. Check it out
below!
Oslund, E., Clemens,
N., Simmons, D.. & Simmons, D. (2018). The direct and indirect effects of
word reading and vocabulary on adolescents’ reading comprehension: Comparing
struggling and adequate comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 31, 355-379.
No comments:
Post a Comment